Anycubic to Launch $169 Photon Zero SLA Printer

Anycubic is set to offer its brand-new Anycubic Photon Zero MSLA 3D printer at a very competitive price of $169. It sounds cheap, but will it be cheerful? Here’s what we know so far.

It is the time when you can see a 3D printer as usual as you can see a garage. People across the globe have came to know about the 3D printer and 3D printing. It is fascinating to use this technology at home. Many manufacturers have started manufacturing small 3D printers. These are easy to use, budget friendly, and one can find best 3D printer at lower costs also. There are many 3D printer manufacturing companies are there in the market. One of them is Anycubic. This is widely known for its products.

It is an Shenzhen-based manufacturer of the i3 Mega and Photon 3D printers (plus myriad others). These are their famous products. They has seen its fair share of success. Certainly, these two printers, in particular, are well regarded in the All3DP office, picking up our gongs for the “Best 3D Printer under $300” and “Best Budget Resin 3D Printer ” in the summer of 2019.

The Photon, in particular, stood top of the pile for a significant stretch of time as the best budget desktop resin printer, but with more competition entering the marketplace (such as the Photon’s usurper, the Elegoo Mars), Anycubic is reacting with a race to the bottom with the Anycubic Photon Zero, which will launch with a scintillatingly low price of $169.

According to the Anycubic, the first 100 customers to buy directly from its official store online will only pay $99. Not so fast though – the printer isn’t available yet.

So what’s different about the Photon Zero? How is Anycubic squeezing the price down? We’ll try to answer this with an in-depth look at the specifications. Here’s all we currently know about the Anycubic Photon Zero.

Eye-catcher:- it’s features

Perhaps the most noticeable difference between the original Photon and the new Photon Zero will be the size of the print bed. The Photon touts a build volume of 115 x 65 x 155 mm, whereas the Photon Zero only offers up 97 x 54 x 150 mm. If you’re coming to the Zero from a fused deposition modeling (FDM) printer, this build volume may sound ridiculously small, but for a budget MSLA machine, this is relatively ordinary.


Anycubic boasts a combination of linear rail and lead screw for stable and accurate Z-axis motion. Linear rails are becoming pretty standard fare on low-cost desktop resin printers, so to see it stick around in an overtly cheaper machine is nice. This should result in smoother vertical movement and result in better prints. It would also appear that the Anycubic Photon Zero benefits from an upgraded UV lighting module, although we’ve seen no further details to comment on this.

Another simple yet effective feature: Thanks to markings in the resin vat, you can now see the amount of material you have left – something missing from previous Photon models.


Anycubic has updated its Photon Workshop software to version 2.1.20. A huge step up in terms of functionality over the Photon Workshop that shipped with the original Photon (and even last year’s Photon S), the new software offers a number of essential resin print preparation tools. According to Anycubic, an 80 MB file now slices in just 32 seconds instead of several minutes.


Sounds too good to be true, doesn’t it? Well, a saving had to be made somewhere to squeak that price down, and it would appear that the masking LCD screen is the component that has been hit with the budget stick.

When compared to older Photon models, that slightly smaller build volume of the Photon Zero is underpinned by an even smaller masking screen packing a diminutive resolution of 480 x 854 pixels. As such, the X/Y resolution takes a hit, increasing to a pixel size of 115 microns – more than four times the size of the Photon’s 47-micron pixel size.

We’ve yet to see prints first hand but can only wonder how noticeable the difference is. Aggressive 16x anti-aliasing within the Photon Workshop software should alleviate the dip in quality, but we can only speculate as to how much.


Technology: LCD
Type: Resin
Year: 2020
Assembly: Fully assembled
Manufacturer: Anycubic
Country: China
Build Volume: 97 x 54 x 150 mm (3.81 x 2.12 x 5.9 in)
Layer Height: 10+ microns
XY Resolution: 0.115 mm (480 x 854 pixels)
Z-axis positioning accuracy: 0.01 mm
Printing Speed: 30 mm/h
Bed-Leveling: n/a
Display: Touchscreen
Third-Party Materials: Yes
Materials: 405 nm UV resin
Recommended Slicer: Photon Workshop (2.1.20)
Operating system: Windows / Mac OSX
File types: STL
Connectivity: USB
Frame dimensions: 180 x 195 x 367 mm (7.08 x 7.76 x 14.44 in)
Boxed size: n/a
Weight (packed): n/a…

Read More

Would a digital border tax slow down adoption of 3D printing?

The global revenues from the 3D printing (3DP) have been rapidly increasing by almost 30% a year. And it is happening from over the previous 30 years, but still they contributed less than 0.1% of global manufacturing revenues in 2018.

Till now, the higher units take more cost of manufacturing and longer production times than traditionally volume-manufactured goods, which have set the decrease in 3DP global adoption rates. This has been the case despite the fact that there is no any type of customs duties are applied to 3DP files crossing borders. But what could change if such duties became the norm?

3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, is sometimes used to produce custom-made objects, such as dental aligners, hearing aids and shoe midsoles; or objects that have seems to have a tough or impossible forms. We naturally tend to focus on the actual physical printing. Behind the scenes, however, computer-aided designs (CAD) are the main part of any 3D printing. These are the digital files which carry all the critical information which will be required to print the object.

In this world, which have now become a globalized world, sometimes digital files often cross borders, then they are considered as “electronic transmissions”. Thus, they fall under the scope of a so called “moratorium” on duties on electronic transmissions under the World Trade Organization (WTO) framework, regardless of whether they are considered goods or services.

The moratorium came into existence in 1998. At that time all the members of WTO agreed on the concept that they will not impose customs duties on electronic transmissions for two years. Since then, it has been rolled-over at every Ministerial Conference of the WTO without much controversy, until recently.

The world we are living in have now become more technology based. As the goods and services have become more and more digital, such as e-books, streaming videos and online education. They are now traded across the borders, some countries started to argue in favour of making it permanent, to facilitate more digital and offline trade; while others want to lift it to increase customs revenues, amongst other reasons.

In December of 2019, the member of WTO had extended it again through to June 2020. On this time the next meeting will be held when the senior trade meeting will take place in Nur Sultan, Kazakhstan. At the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), discussions are ongoing on international corporate taxation in the context of the digital economy. This is a very different topic if we compare it with tariffs paid at the border, on physical or virtual products.

What would keeping the moratorium mean for 3DP?

Putting a hold on digital duties would most likely begin to promote the 3DP. There will be an increase in its adoption due to it’s lower trade friction costs. This might also encourage innovation, as CAD files could be created collaboratively across the borders, for instance using a cloud-based solution. It could also contribute to levelling the playing field among countries for 3DP adoption. There will be no customs duties which may influence some firms on how to distribute their value chains around the globe.

Would digital duties slow down 3DP?

There is certainly a chance that it might happen. Moreover, as 3DP becomes integrated into the existing manufacturing processes, firms will begin to consider the fact or we should say they will search around and will find which countries tax e-transmissions. Then they are going to operate from that country just to save taxes which will eventually going to increase their profit. Thus, digital duties will not just affect 3DP adoption as a niche area, but will also have wider implications in a broader spectrum of industries and in trade.

How would countries impose digital duty for 3DP?

Applying customs duties on 3DP files will aslo require the same level of control over digital trade as we have on physical trade. Technological capabilities are likely to be needed to track down the digital flows, and their availability will differ as we go through across the countries. The cost of acquiring these capabilities will vary country by country and the actual enforcement of customs duties on e-transmissions may also vary, while in some cases it may bea bit high. This is key in order not to enlarge the “digital divide” from yet another perspective.

What other options are available?

VAT or sales tax will be a better option than custom duties. Applying VAT or sales tax will be easy and widely acceptable as it is well known in almost every single country. Some countries, such as Australia, Switzerland, India and the European Union, have taken this direction with the goal of achieving equity in consumption tax between domestic and foreign actors in digital trade transactions of goods and services.…

Read More

How Far Has 3D Printing Gone in Home Building?

The concept of 3D printing has evolved a lot in the past few years. The first ever prototype of a 3D printers was introduced during the 1980s and Japanese designer, Hideo Kodama was the first person who made this technology popular among the masses. Then four years later, these 3D printers have become more powerful in terms of speed and it’s versatility.

Evolution of 3D Printing in Building Homes

In the past few years, we have seen many construction companies have prototyped various methods of 3D printing business ideas for creating an affordable houses and customized buildings. Through 3D printing technology or additive manufacturing, these construction controllers or we should say buisness have been able to cut down on various construction and operational costs. Nevertheless, a lot of people are still skeptical about the scalability and efficiency of 3D print technology for building homes.

In this article, we will look at the evolution of 3D printing technology and its role in the construction of homes and buildings.

Budget and Operational Costs

If we consider it’s maintenance and operational costs, it is almost or we should say generally all new technologies and inventions require a high amont of budgeting. Similarly, commercial and industrial 3D printers can be a quite expensive for some while for some it may be just a machine to work on.

As the technology is increasing day by day it is now easy to customise some thing or make changes in it. Gradually, with some continuous ongoing research and development in 3D printing technology or additive manufacturing, more advanced and economical 3D printers were developed. You can find best 3D printer around you but remember that it should be perfect for your work then it will be considered as best 3D printer. Still, the price of a complete 3D printed home can cost up to $10,000!

ICON’s 3D Printed Homes

In the beginning of the year 2018, a construction startup company named ICON collaborated with a non-profit organization, New Story Charity to build an affordable houses for all so that anyone can buy it easily. The house was planned to make through 3D printing technology. Together, they then managed to build a full neighborhood of 3D printed homes. Their main moto was to provide a well maintained accommodation to those who cannot afford proper homes due to the high prices of the houses which is not a piece of cake for a middle class family.

The project was worth $10,000 and was completed in just 24 hours! ICON also plans to cut down the costs even more in near future. Today, their main objective is to assist in the rehabilitation of affectees of tsunami, earthquake and other natural disasters.

The printer used in the construction of the house weighed around a ton. Such printers are believed to reduce various labor and construction costs. Still, a lot of research is yet to be made as there are various technical issues regarding pipelines and electrical cables.

WinSun’s 3D Printed Building

In 2016, a Chinese company Winsun had created a whole building using 3D printing technology or additive manufacturing. The cost of manufacturing was around 140,000 dollars. It was completed in a total of just 17 days.

Living in a 3D Printed House

The first ever people who came to live in 3D printed house was actually a French family. It became a great news of that time as it was happening very first time. They are going to be the best consumer to take feedback of. In today’s time that house is considered as a prototype for the upcoming 3D printed houses. The project took a total of 54 hours to complete and its cost is estimated to be around $226,700.

Future of 3D Printing in Building Houses

Through the examples of the projects we have discussed above, it is quite an evident that it may be possible to build an entire house through 3D printing technology in less time and in almost less budget. So, we can say that the 3D printing technology will be a more superior and sustainable solution for building homes in future and at affordable prices.

The current advancements produced in the world of 3D printing facilitates building only smaller houses as printing of metals through 3D printers is still a challenging task for construction companies. That’s why the main gal of any construction companies is to completely automate the entire construction process.

In order to trace on traditional structures, it is very important to develop one of the best 3D printers that can be used on metal as well as on other materials as we will need more material to build a strong and long lasting house. Moreover, another challenging task is to automate plumbing and electrical tasks. As of now, these tasks have to be performed manually by professionals.…

Read More